Posted by Garret Johnson in Literary Apologetics | 12 Comments
The Call to Adventure
Holidays always feel like a time to read the stuff that’s so fun it seems you shouldn’t be allowed to read it any time else. Books with adventure. The bigger and wilder and less familiar the better. It’s a silly constraint, I think, this feeling that we ought to be reading something else (though I place it on myself all the time). But that’s not exactly my focus here. Not exactly.
I’m interested in the idea of adventure, itself, the curious pull it has. It’s a pull often as strong on its readers as it apparently is on the characters involved in it. I’ve recently been struck by the phenomenon of that peculiar moment in adventure stories when things really gets going, the initial step toward something new. It’s what Joseph Campbell referred to as the “call to adventure,” that moment when the hero first feels some kind of pull toward the unknown.
Here’s a classic example.
In chapter two of JRR Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, after Bilbo’s famous and dramatic disappearance, Frodo, the hitherto reluctant hero, “found himself wondering at times, especially in the autumn, about the wild lands, and strange visions of mountains that he had never seen came into his dreams. He began to say to himself: ‘Perhaps I shall cross the River myself one day.’”
And just before things really get cracking in LOTR, we’re told that “Frodo began to feel restless, and the old paths seemed too well-trodden. He looked at maps, and wondered what lay beyond their edges: maps made in the Shire showed mostly white spaces beyond their borders. He took to wandering further afield and more often by himself.”
In Treasure Island, the promise of adventure entices as much by what’s tantalizingly left out as by what’s given: “These gentlemen,” starts the narrator, “having asked me to write down the whole particulars about Treasure Island, from beginning to the end, keeping nothing back but the bearings of the island, and that only because there is still treasure not yet lifted, I take up my pen in the year of grace 17—, and go back to the time when my father kept the Admiral Benbow inn, and the brown old seaman, with the saber cut, first took up his lodging under our roof.”
This same quality permeates the beginnings of adventure stories from all ages. A more recent example appears in The Phantom Tollbooth, when Milo comes home from school to find (not surprisingly) a tollbooth, complete with coin slot and sign, in his bedroom, beyond it a road he’d never dreamt of, one that would take him to places he couldn’t have imagined. This is the exact moment the real thrill of the story starts. Coincidentally, that charming and witty tale is in many ways an allegory about acquiring knowledge—a fit subject for the adventure story, as I’ll explain in a minute.
Looking further back, right near the start of Chrétien de Troyes’ twelfth-century Arthurian romance, Yvain, the Knight with the Lion, we see ‘the call’ take this form: “It happened some seven years ago that, as solitary as a country-man, I was travelling in quest of adventures, fully equipped with arms as a knight should be, when on the right hand I found a way leading through a dense forest.”
All these beginnings, and literally countless others, show a recognition in the tellers’ sensibilities of the pull that such story openings have, the power in them to entice, intrigue, get the reader buckled in for a long ride of twists and turns leading to unexpected dangers and treasures. These beginnings excite us. And authors from Homer to Dumas to Tolkien have always known it.
But why do we get excited? What deep-seated impulse makes us sit up a little straighter when we come to that point in a story when adventure calls?
Here’s one possible answer—though I’m really interested in what others might think about this: It seems that this desire to take part in adventure, to find out new things, discover new places, is at its heart a desire for new knowledge.
It’s the thrill of a journey, but more specifically of discovery. A child’s impulse to grab a friend and say, “Let’s go exploring,” Columbus’s impulse to sail, Coronado’s, Magellan’s, and our own generation’s desire to explore the Moon, Mars, the far reaches of space. It all seems connected somehow to this idea of a desire for new—and new kinds of—knowledge.
Also, very interestingly, despite the fact that our favorite adventuring protagonists often don’t seem to have a particular motive, most of us will likely never accuse them of having a bad one, or will think their desire for adventure is somehow wrong. It just simply is, we feel. And it’s natural. We completely understand it. We’re on their side. We’re excited along with them. No author ever has to take pains to justify their hero’s pursuit of adventure, even if the hero has no particular force acting on him other than ‘restlessness.’
So the second fundamental question is: Why are we so quick to accept this impulse in adventuring characters, an impulse that—as it happens—seems wrapped up with the impulse to acquire knowledge?
The answer to this might sound surprising. But hang with me for a sec.
It seems possible—and upon deep reflection, almost probable—that such desires are rooted in an eternal desire for knowing more about God, creator of The Adventure Story, himself. The ineffable, invisible, incomprehensible, but—according to Christian theology at least—indeed knowable.
Whoa, weird connection. Yes. Let me explain.
I’ve often wondered if heaven could be thought of as, in some sense, a kind of eternal journey, an eternal adventure—eternal discovery.
Consider the possibility that, as finite beings made in the image of an infinite God, part of living in eternity with such a God would be continually learning more about him. Imagine regularly acquiring profound, new bits of knowledge that, once learned—like all profound discoveries—prompt a looking back on everything else that came before, prompt a recasting of everything in light of the information just discovered, in light of the new corner just turned.
What more lasting definition of bliss could there be?
This could explain why some characters, who have perfectly stable—often enviable—lives, who aren’t propelled out on their journeys by some tragedy or revenge agenda, still knowingly risk their comfortable, untroubled situations for the sake of adventure. (It would also explain why we still root for them.) They—and we—sense there’s something more ultimate to existence than simply subsisting, or being comfortable, or having all that’s needed and wanted, or even being ‘happy.’ There’s always something more. And the internal pull toward it, we sense, is not a bad thing.
There’s something inherently desirable about gaining new and deeper knowledge of reality. And it doesn’t take much of a leap from that point to recognize that there’s something infinitely desirable about gaining new and deeper knowledge of an infinitely desirable object—all the more so an object you can be in relationship with, a person.
Adventure stories, then, with their promises of seemingly boundless knowledge to be gained at their beginnings, echo the truly boundless knowledge there is to be gained about God. As a corollary to that, this culturally, historically, geographically universal affinity for adventure stories may in fact be a response in image-bearers of an eternal God to that grand Story we all have a sense of being wrapped up in. As Ecclesiastes puts it: He “has set eternity in the hearts of men.”
So I’m curious what others think. Could this be why we love adventure so much?









You know, of all the things I think about (and there are many!), and out of all the books I’ve read, I don’t think this idea had ever come to my mind until now. What a wonderful observation!
Thank you so much. There is much to think about here!
Thanks so much for the comment, Mo!
This idea also didn’t occur to me (as such) till somewhat recently. It had been swirling around in various unfinished forms for some time, but it was a pleasure to discover these connections. Some of them only crystallized (to the extent that they actually are crystallized) when I sat down to write–a phenomenon that often occurs: the attempt at articulation drawing out connections not fully grasped beforehand.
Glad you enjoyed!
Just picked up Campbell’s book from the library–thanks for the tip! It’s great so far (minus a couple first-chapter spots about Freud and Jung. Psychoanalysis has never really been my cup of tea…) :) I’ve been wanting to read something like that–and like this article–for a while now. Physical/spiritual pilgrimages have always been fascinating to me…the idea of journeying into what, at first, seems unknown (geographically and spiritually) but ends up being most REAL and even most HUMAN to the pilgrim (since, like you mentioned, we seem to be made to venture out and pursue knowledge of eternal unknowns.) I can’t help but agree that we’re designed to search for (and find!) our God, but I also think we’re wired up as human bodies to combine those spiritual quests with physical ones…and maybe that’s another reason why we love adventure stories so much. Good adventures writers seem to understand the physical/spiritual overlap and, thanks to their stories, we often find ourselves at the intersection of internal soulscape and external topography. It makes me think of C.S. Lewis’ little quip in “The Pilgrim’s Regress” about “the tether and pang of the particular,” and how “it is not for nothing that the Landlord has knit our hearts so closely to time and place.” In my mind, the quest for knowledge that happens in “time and place” truly allows a reader to search the heights and depths of reality (ie: the divine) for knowledge while still feeling somewhat anchored to their temporary “home.” There is freedom and adventure in that safety (and Incarnational theology truly does give us a beautiful opportunity to witness heavenly action and earthly interplay!)
When a God who walks through gardens and takes on flesh writes Himself into the very fabric of our spiritual plot, Christianity really does become adventure like none other. It takes heaven AND earth to make the story complete, and the adventure is so much richer thanks to that intersection.
Rally great article– thanks again!
So glad you enjoyed it, Aimee!
I think you’ve REALLY hit on something with the idea of our being designed to combine spiritual quests with physical ones. I think that’s exactly right. And I think it definitely sheds new light on this question of why we feel so drawn to ‘physical’ adventures, or stories in which we get to see (or experience) external adventures play out. Wonderful input! Thanks! It pushes this idea further for me.
That Lewis quote you mention about “the tether and pang of the particular” fits really nicely into this discussion. In fact, the idea opens up so many avenues of connection I may need to do another post about it at some point. One of the things I tell my creative writing students all the time is that the most powerful way to evoke some universal principle (or to communicate some ethereal or otherwise non-corporeal IDEA to readers) is by rendering intensely SPECIFIC particulars. (I’m certainly not the first writer or teacher or critic to say that, either). And I think it’s true for the very reason you suggest Adventure stories resonate with us so much: We are physical-spiritual beings. What happens to our bodies (or more broadly, our external lives) affects our souls, and vice versa. This idea always reminds me of Lewis’ comment (via Screwtape) on the importance of the physicality of praying, in contrast to Coleridge who “did not pray with moving lips and bended knee” but by simply “composing his spirit to love.” Lewis seemed to want to point out that being spiritual beings designed for and with bodies meant that what we DID with our bodies (even in very small ways) indeed made a difference to our spiritual selves (and to the fruitfulness of our spiritual activities). That may not sound entirely related to the whole idea of “adventure,” but I see a connection there—it’s the same power inherent in literature, as a whole, to give readers an “experience” of something (rather than just explain it to them in abstract terms) that is also the power inherent, in a heightened way, in “adventure” stories to give readers the experience of an internally transformative quest through an externally embarked upon adventure.
Your point about the place of Incarnational theology in this is also spot on, I think. It reminds me of the, truly, utterly unique message about reality that resides in the mere fact itself of the Trinitarian God (not to mention His actual story, told through both Word and History).
You bring up quite a few very interesting points. Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts!
I hope others will join the discussion and toss around some of these ideas.
Garret
P.S. About the psychoanalysis: Yes, you’ll see a lot of that in there. Campbell was actually hugely influenced by Jung and his work on “archetypes.” One of the fascinating things to me is that Jung’s whole conception of both “archetypes” and the “collective unconscious” (and Campbell’s development of them) are in many ways doing the work of theologians delineating the idea of “typology,” but with the presuppositions flipped.
In other words, Jung and Campbell would say that this “meta-narrative” of the Hero’s Journey and these universal archetypes (which all cultures seem to share) are PRODUCTS of a communal/collective unconscious, in which all the people in a given culture partake. Whereas the typologist (someone like Meredith Kline, for example) would say that we all share this meta-narrative and these universal archetypes not because we unconsciously CREATED them together but because they exist as objective universal principles, outside of us, put in place by the eternal God who created all of US in the same image.
The end result is that, paradoxically, people like Campbell (even though he and Jung, et al, are starting with near opposite presuppositions about the origins of these concepts) still say a TON that’s of immense value to those of us on the other side. Those of us who see the transcendent Creator as the ultimate explanation for why we all, being created in His image, want to tell the same stories.
Thanks again for the great thoughts!
Ha. *Really* great.
:)
I think you hit the nail on the head that ultimately the adventure is about seeking knowledge. My first memory of having that connection made for me was Jason seeking out the golden fleece. It wasn’t just about getting that magical wool, it was about what Jason brought back to the people in his head.
When we come back from our adventure, we have to tell the tale. Otherwise, there was no point in the adventure.
Thanks, Matt! Yes, that’s definitely a GREAT example of an archetypal “adventure” story. And, as you point out, it definitely highlights this point well. As you also point out, one of the other major components of the adventure story is the hero’s RETURN to the “ordinary world,” the one he’s left behind for a time to venture into the “special world” (the place where new knowledge is gained). Those, at least, are Joseph Campbell’s terms. And that other aspect of the story (that other bookend, so to speak, to the adventure) is a great place to see this whole point about Adventure being tightly wrapped up with Knowledge. Helpful observation!
Yes indeed, what would it be like to have an adventure and no one to tell it to?
This often makes me think of Plato’s allegory of the cave. Even in that purely philosophical piece (which is EXPLICITLY about the idea of gaining knowledge), you see the same shape of narrative that epitomizes adventure stories. The prisoner who’s freed from the cave makes his way up toward the mysterious light, emerges eventually into the sun, where he’s “enlightened,” and then wants to run back down into the cave to share this new knowledge (or, perhaps, this new perspective on knowledge already partially possessed) with all his friends who are still chained in the dark looking at shadows.
Thanks for bringing up these points!
Great article, very interesting!
Just one quick question: In heaven wouldn´t we know everthing? Would it be possible not know anything which we could learn?
Hi Nelson. Thanks for the great question!
That’s one of the very things I’ve puzzled over so much that I was inspired to write this post.
The first thing to say is: Perhaps it’s impossible to know the answer till we get there. But, the second thing to say (or ask, rather) is: Can knowledge of God Himself (immortal, invisible, eternal, trinitarian, etc) be utterly exhausted at some point?
The more I’ve pondered THAT question (and searched for answers in realms of both Scripture and logic), the more I’ve moved to saying: No, I don’t think so… But really, that’s the heart of what this post is actually exploring. You’ve dug to the essential question that got this whole train of ideas started.
So thanks for adding this to the conversation! I’d be interested to hear what others’ think, too!
Scripture describes heaven as a place where “every tear will be wiped away,” where God will “make all things new,” when the dead will be “raised imperishable,” and where numerous other mysterious and wonderful things will be. My sense is that we may indeed have an infinite CAPACITY to learn. But will we immediately possess infinite knowledge of all things in every way? It would seem that only God could possibly ever fit into the unique category of such a knower.
To me, that’s a fascinating thing, and that’s where this idea of adventure-as-divine-longing-for-deeper-knowledge comes in. The thought that we could be forever seeking more intimate, deep knowledge of the Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer of the universe (like a line on a graph that gets infinitely closer to the Y-axis but never technically crosses onto it), seems both amazingly exciting and somehow possible.
What do you think??? There’s so much to say about this (perhaps an infinite amount :) )
Thank you very much for your reply!I have also wonder about this topic for some time.Tt’s indeed a mystery but here are some thoughts I have about knowlege in heaven. They are very similar to your thoughts. :)
-Knowledge of what? There are things we don´t know about this life that we will get to know in heaven. We could finally know everything of this earth and be constantly learning in the new earth, maybe that could be the knowlege that we could know everything about.
-Since our relationship with God will be perfect, we could have a deeper knowledge about God, and be infinitely learning from an infinite source of knowlede.
- If we knew everything, we’d be God. Not even angels know everything.
Blessings.
I have also wondered if we would know everything about other people. For example, tastes, feelings, or thougts. Questions would not exist in a relationship with other persons. Just wondering :)
These are interesting questions. I don’t see why, in the new creation, we would cease to learn (or that we would know everything about a person). Lack of knowledge isn’t a sinful condition, and increasing in knowledge is, or can be, a joy. Imagine all the fun of gradually coming to master a new language, and savoring the new ways to express oneself, but without suffering boredom or fatigue! And getting to know people gradually is also a joy – but without having to worry that they might turn out to be untrustworthy. I anticipate enjoying reading many new books…