Posted by Holly Ordway in Literary Apologetics, Poetry | 11 Comments
The Merits of Reading vs Having Read: A Reflection on Enjoying the Classics
I’ve sometimes seen a contrast made between the desire to read (positive) and the desire to have read (negative). Generally the point is to affirm the value of the reading experience over against just ticking off one more Great Book (or Popular Book) on their reading lists. Does this contrast hold?
On the one hand, the bucket-list approach to reading is problematic. Until I was in my early late 20s, I felt compelled to finish every book that I began, with the result that I slogged through a lot of boring, irrelevant, badly written books. There was no up-side to this, other than a sop to my own ridiculous pride as a persevering reader.
When I learned to put down books that no longer held my interest or attention, I became a more appreciative reader. With my mental palate no longer dulled by frequently having to plow through a sub-par book, I learned to savor what I was reading more fully. I began genuinely to enjoy poetry, and more fully to appreciate the quality of excellent prose.
On the other hand, however, I have discovered that there are significant exceptions to the rule that I should set aside books that I am not actively enjoying.
There are certain books that I do not particularly enjoy reading, but that turn out to have tremendous value in my having read them.
The two most notable examples are Dante’s Divine Comedy and Spenser’s The Faerie Queene.
Dante’s Divine Comedy is, hands down, one of the most important things I’ve ever read, yet I can’t say as I’ve ever enjoyed reading it – not exactly. I first encountered it in high school and did not understand what I read. Nonetheless, Dante got under my skin, as it were. I kept coming back to it, re-reading parts of it, never the whole thing. Dancing with it: drawing near, pulling away. Then a couple of years ago I finally read through the whole thing, canto by canto.
It took months – not because I was deliberately savoring it, but because I wasn’t enjoying it very much… at least not in the way that I tend to define enjoying a book. I would read a canto at a time, sometimes forcing myself to finish reading and not put the book down mid-canto. And when I was done, I realized that I had experienced something of genuine importance, something that happened to me without my conscious awareness.
Dante gives me something deeper and richer than an enjoyable reading experience. He furnishes my imagination with imagery that is too powerful, too rich, for me to appreciate when I first read the words. He gives me insights into my own spiritual journey that I have to unpack over time – and he gives me the language to do it.
The dark wood, the wolf and leopard and lion that bar Dante’s path upward; the long, slow slog through Hell; the frozen heart of Hell; the glimpse of stars as they emerge on the other side, into Purgatory; the garden that Dante finds atop Mount Purgatory; the constant dance and movement in Heaven; all these and many more are images that stay with me, and come to mind when I need them. All these come from the Divine Comedy — from having read it, even though it has not yet moved me deeply while I read it.
And so the Divine Comedy is, I recognize, a lifetime book for me. I re-read it all the way through for a second time, and (in parts) a third time. And I’ll do it again, and again.
Having had this experience with Dante, I recognized it when it occurred a second time. I recently decided to re-read Spenser’s Faerie Queene – or, more accurately, to re-read Book 1 and read for the first time Books 2-6. I had read Book 1 when I was a teenager – I picked up a used copy at a yard sale thinking it was a fantasy novel – and though I understood little of it at the time, something in it gripped me imaginatively. My memory of reading it was of tiny jeweled scenes, disconnected yet bright. I thought that coming to it as an adult would be a delightful experience.
Well, no. I soon discovered that I didn’t enjoy reading The Faerie Queene the way that I had hoped. It was (and is) a challenge to keep reading in a sustained way. After a few pages, I inevitably put the book down. Just as inevitably, a day or two later I pick it up again. There are exciting bits but this is not a page-turner; rather, its power is in the richness of the images and the meaning that they carry.
The images are like those of a medieval tapestry, bright with jewel tones of red, blue, green, gold. Because The Faerie Queene is an allegory, the concepts that Spenser handles begin to be imbued with the rich color and brocaded grandeur of the images used to convey those ideas. Courage, chastity, generosity, temperance – having read Spenser, these words acquire a new depth of flavor and color and texture.
I will continue to read The Faerie Queene, with joy – not because I expect to enjoy the reading at that moment (although I see already that I am learning to enjoy it more as I go), but because Spenser, like Dante, is furnishing my imagination, and oh! with such marvelous things!






I’ll admit I haven’t yet read all of either The Divine Comedy or The Faerie Queen – in the house I grew up in, anything other than the Bible that mentioned Hell, and anything that mentioned “fairies” at all, was frowned upon. But as I work toward making up for my literary deficiencies, I am having some experiences similar to what you describe. Some books that are really good are not necessarily easy or even particularly enjoyable reads; I am actually working at it sometimes. And I am finding that in certain instances, it is best for me to read only a page or two, or even a paragraph or two, and then put the book down and let what I’ve just read sink in thoroughly. So I wholeheartedly concur – having read particular books can provide us with a wealth of imagery and a depth of understanding apart from our pleasure (or lack thereof) in the actual reading.
Oh, Holly, I couldn’t agree with you more on many of the things you say in this post! I feel the same way about The Divine Comedy. I can’t say I really enjoy it in the same way that I enjoy a great novel. But there is so much wisdom and wonderful imagery there. Plus, it takes a lot of focus on concentration for me to fully appreciate the poem. I am midway through Purgatorio as I am taking a rest from it for a while, but I will pick it up again soon.
As I get older, I have tried to stop feeling so guilty about not liking certain classics. I have a hard time enjoying the literature of Dickens though I know he is supposed to be important, and I think that is what I feel the guiltiest about. But there are plenty of other great works I enjoy, and I would rather spend my time reading those works instead!
Thanks, Becka & Ali! Becka, that’s been my experience as well – that I often can only read a little bit at a time. At first I thought it was a failing in me, as a reader (since I can read for hours, usually), but then I realized that it depends *what* I’m reading. And I’m not on a schedule, after all: if I inch through the Faerie Queene over months or years, why not?
Ali, I know exactly what you mean about needing to rest from Dante – almost like resting while you’re actually climbing up the mountain! I still feel slightly guilty at times over authors I don’t read but ‘ought to’. Sometimes I just have to let it go. I’m never going to like Flannery O’Connor, even though I have friends who think she’s fabulous. And I’m not going to force myself through her stories just for the sake of it. But on the other hand sometimes there are authors I’ve been indifferent to, who just were waiting for the right time. Believe it or not, I didn’t use to like Jane Austen, until I started re-reading her work just two or three years ago and WOW! I realized why people love her so much! The books were the same, but as the reader I had to arrive at the right place!
First of all, excuse all my typos in my comments! What’s up with that??!! Clearly I don’t know how to proofread! : )
And second of all, I am glad you feel the same way about Dante! It does require stamina and hard work to read The Divine Comedy, but it truly, truly is a rewarding work to read. And I think it is similar to the Bible in that a person derives a great benefit from reading it multiple times, especially with the help of commentators who have more expertise than we do.
I also feel the same way about the works of Flannery O’Connor (as well as the works of Walker Percy). I only enjoy O’Connor’s nonfiction work, and I am very partial to her collection of letters, The Habit of Being, because I think it illuminates for the reader her sacramental view of the world. And I only recently have come to appreciate canonical authors like Charlotte Bronte. Coming to an appreciation of a work like Jane Eyre was only possible for me as an adult because I didn’t really understand what love was all about when I was in ninth grade and read it for the first time.
I recently listened to a podcast of Alan Jacobs discussing his most recent work, The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction. In this podcast, he says that we don’t always have to read the canonical books and that there is much value in reading other books for pleasure. I know you read his book because you blogged about it; perhaps you might enjoy listening the lecture.
Holly, you make (another!) good point – timing is a definite factor in what I enjoy reading at any given time. I’ve come back to some books that I couldn’t get through when I was younger, and really enjoyed them; and the reverse has happened as well – some that I liked a lot before have lost some of their luster, not because they aren’t good books, but simply because I’m in a different place.
Ali & Becka – I find it comforting to not have to expect myself to enjoy all the “greats” all the time, but to recognize that I am growing as a reader and will do so all my life! Just this afternoon I was reading Charles Williams, a bit from The Descent of the Dove and then another bit from He Came Down From Heaven, and thinking “This is amazing, brilliant stuff” — and then thinking, “If I’d read this three years ago, it would have gone completely over my head” — partly because of necessary background knowledge, but also partly because I needed to have had more experience in prayer on a practical level before I could really appreciate what CW was talking about. There are some poets whose work I am looking forward to re-reading soon (if possible) because I think I’ll get something that I didn’t on the first pass… I know there’s a lot more to be had from Tennyson and Coleridge than I got on the first go, ten or fifteen years ago.
Hi Holly.
I just finished listening to your 2nd interview on Apologetics 315, and decided pay your blog a visit.
Your interest in connecting literature (Fantasy, no less!) with apologetics, and reason with imagination is refreshing.
With respect to this entry, I haven’t quite made it to the two works you are discussing, but felt the same way about Hugo’s “Les Miserables.” Though a tough slog while I went through the chapters where he laid foundations for later story threads, it was so worth it by the end.
Also, your description of your journey to faith made me smile, as I remembered one of my own major turning points. Then a teen ‘believing in’ God, but living like the world, I was reading “Cleric Quintet” by a Mormon author (Salvatore), thinking to myself — “I actually believe in a God who CAN do all these things.”
It’s funny what God can use to bring someone to his senses.
I’m going to recommend you to a believer I know who likes to promote the work of people like yourself, especially those who would reclaim the Christian interaction with the arts.
God bless!
Thanks for the comment, Wes, and for recommending my work — much appreciated.
I think one of the merits of having widely recognized ‘classics’ (contra those who think having a canon is oppressive, etc.) is that it helps give confidence to readers who are a bit bogged down: “keep going, generations of readers have found something of value in what’s ahead.” Of course, that’s not to say that every ‘classic’ is equally good, or that every reader will benefit from all classics equally (certainly not), but there are reasons to think that finishing Les Miserables would be worthwhile in a way that finishing some other doorstop of a book might not be.
Is there anything good to be said about Ulysees? For a long time after being made to read 2 chapters, I used his name as a cuss word.
Hi Wes, I assume you mean Ulysses by James Joyce? Yes, indeed there are things to be said for it, but I am not the person to say them! I do not like Joyce at all (and I think that Finnegans Wake is a ghastly joke perpetuated upon literary critics), but I have come to realize that Joyce has been deeply meaningful to many intelligent and sensitive readers. Seamus Heaney, for instance, is a poet whom I admire very much, and Heaney acknowledges a debt to Joyce. Very strange, from my perspective, but I’ll grant that there must be something there!
By “his name”, I mean James Joyce.