Dec 19, 2007

Posted by in Christian Life | 3 Comments

Good News, Bad News

I’ve been noticing something frightening lately. The idea of “good” and “bad” is rapidly disappearing from the public vocabulary. I don’t just mean in moral terms – though in fact the concept of “evil” has been at best trivialized or at worst abolished in public discourse, which leaves us, individually and collectively, stunningly vulnerable to the forces of evil – but rather in the simplest terms, the most practical terms imaginable.

 

I was struck last week by a New York Times article reporting on an advertising campaign intended to raise public awareness of mental illness in children. The advertisements had the form of “ransom notes” informing the public that such-and-such disorder had kidnapped their child. For instance: “We have your son. We will make sure he will no longer be able to care for himself or interact socially as long as he lives.” — Signed, Autism. Some parents of autistic children complained. Why? Because the campaign made it seem like children with autism were damaged or had something in need or repair.

 

The implications are terrifying.

 

We are not yet quite at the point at which our culture says that it is no worse to be blind than to see, no better to be able to walk independently than to be unable to walk… but we’re close. At the same time that psychological and mental diagnoses of illness are proliferating, so too is the idea vanishing that these constitute dis-ability.

 

As sinning human beings, we sadly often fail at putting into action the truth that all human beings are precious and valuable, no matter how able or disabled they are, mentally or physically. We must continue to work at that. But the way forward is to embrace equal value in the face of disability, not deny the existence of disability. Saying that an autistic person is simply made different, not disabled, by his inability to process stimuli, or that a child with Asperger’s who cannot understand emotions doesn’t have something broken in her brain, strikes a blow at the very heart of the concept of “good” and “bad,” at the ideal of human wholeness and health. – and that has deadly implications for all of us.

 

I am an athlete, a competitive fencer. My joy in fencing is a special gift; the fact that I have a physical body to use (for fencing, walking, typing this essay, and so on) is part of the package of being a created human being. Last spring I developed severe tendonitis in my right elbow from overuse, and wound up in excruciating pain. I couldn’t so much as pick up a glass of water, shift from park to drive in my car, or hold a pen without intense pain. I literally lost most of the use of my arm.

 

I was disabled. Dis-abled, not differently abled.

 

I was every bit as much a human being as before my injury, but with all my heart I wanted to be healed, wanted to be free of pain, wanted to be able to do again what I used to be able to do.

 

Thanks be to God, I progressed well in physical therapy, am able to fence again, and am almost (though not entirely) pain-free. I also learned a great deal during that time. I came to understand that I needed to abide patiently in whatever state of ability or dis-ability I was in. Whatever my condition, God is working through it for my ultimate good (and I did grow in my relationship with Him during the difficult time of my rehab). It was (and is) my responsibility to work hard to enable that healing to take place, holding in mind the vision of health and wholeness that is God’s image for each of us.

 

What I fear is being lost in our culture is that vision of wholeness. Personally, I am grateful that my fencing teammates were supportive of me while I was in rehab, considering me just as much a member of the team even when I wasn’t able to participate (and patiently putting up with intermittent bouts of whining). I am appreciative that my coach was willing to modify our lessons to accommodate my disability. But I am even more grateful that no one gave up on me – not my therapist, not my teammates, not my coach, not my pastor – as I worked hard to recover the full use of my arm.

 

I was disabled for a time. But my disability was not part of my identity.

 

What I fear is that our culture is increasingly encouraging people to claim dysfunction as identity. Two thousand years ago, Christ walked among the people, healing them. The paralyzed, He made to walk; the deaf to hear, the blind to see. What does He find today?

 

People who resist the idea of curing deafness in children in the name of preserving “deaf culture.” Anorexics who resist treatment because they define themselves by their disorder. The popularization of “body modification” by scarring, piercing, and tattooing in extreme. Parents whose rightful protection of their autistic children’s value as human beings leads them to deny that autism causes damage, not just difference.

 

If our culture is losing the sense of “good” and “bad” even on the physical, practical level, it has already lost it on the moral level. The only value judgment left to us is the distinction between “I like it” and “I don’t like it.”

 

What’s the result?

 

Back in pagan times, people recognized the existence of sin and evil. They didn’t have an effective way to deal with it, but they accepted that humans are flawed and the world is broken. The Christian gospel was good news: the announcement that, finally, humankind had a complete and comprehensive answer to the problem of sin.

 

The gospel is only good news to people who understand that they are sinners.

 

So evangelists in the modern day have a challenge unprecedented in the history of Christianity. Christians have always been counter-cultural, but never so much as now. The gospel has been met with “it’s too good to be true” and “it’s not true” but not with “I don’t need it.”

 

For us in the present day, it’s necessary to first preach the bad news – we are sinners, evil is real – before the good news can be heard as such. We cannot be healed unless we want to be healed. And before we can want to be healed, we have to recognize that we are sick.

 

It is easier, in the short term, to redefine individuality and self-worth so broadly as to include all forms of dysfunction, easier to avoid the pain of correction and overlook the places that need repair. But easier doesn’t mean better. In my physical therapy sessions, having the therapist break up the scar tissue along the tendons in my arm was excruciating; even with my high pain tolerance it literally brought me to tears. But I’m glad my therapist cared enough to do what needed to be done.

 

Recognizing that we are broken, in need of repair, dysfunctional, disabled is hard. Pretending we’re not broken only blinds us to the vision of wholeness, health, and joy that ought to be ours.

 

Healing is often difficult and painful. That does not make it less necessary. The fact that we are broken does not mean that we should settle for anything less than wholeness.

Be Sociable, Share!

    No related posts.

    1. Holly,
      I would just like to say to you that I enjoy reading your posts. I can’t say that I always agree with everything you write but I couldn’t agree with you more with your statement that the gospel is good news only to people who understand that they are sinners.

      Is the gospel for everyone (universally) or is for those only who understand that they are sinners? If you preach the gospel message that we are bad, poor, wretched, weak and undone bankrupt sinners, who do you think will respond favorably to that message?

      Stephen preached boldly that same message but he was stoned to death. The people that he preached to even stopped their ears, ran upon him with one accord and cast him out of the city before they stoned him. By the way, there was a young man there that they (the ones who stoned him) laid their coats at his feet by the name of Saul. Why didn’t he respond favorably to that gospel message as well? He later bacame the greatest preacher to ever preach the gospel other than The Lord Jesus Christ himself. What was the difference in his life that later caused him to change? Was it the gospel?

      I would like to hear your thoughts when you have the time.

    2. Holly E. Ordway says:

      I think that my answer has to be, in short, “I don’t know.”

      But venturing a guess… I think the gospel is for everyone, but not everyone who hears is ready to listen. Sometimes those who are most vehement in rejecting it, do so because they recognize (at some level, conscious or not) that it is true and that its truth challenges them to change (and change is always hard).

      What caused Saul to change? Meeting the risen Christ. It wasn’t the message; it was the Person. And so I would say that it isn’t the specific words of the gospels, but the Holy Spirit acting through them, that transforms lives. How that works and why some are ready to listen and others aren’t, I have no idea.

      I would toss out there the fact that it wasn’t preaching of the gospel, per se, that led me to become a Christian. The Holy Spirit worked in me through other ways, through personal witness of a Christian life (without preaching), through apologetics, through direct experience. The Bible is now an essential part of my walk with Christ but it was hardly involved at all in my acceptance of Christ in the first place. I didn’t accept Jesus as my Savior because of what He said, but because of Who He is; and because I accepted Him, I was then committed to reading and living by what Scripture says.

    3. Holly,
      Thanks for your response. I would certainly concur with you that Saul had a life altering conversion when he met the risen Christ on the road to Damascus. And I also agree that up until that time the gospel message only had an adverse affect on him. As a matter of fact he had the authority and was responsible for persecuting many christians. That’s what his intentions were when he was struck down. He hated the gospel and thought he was doing a service to God by persecuting those who were following Christ.

      It was the life giving voice of the Son of God that made all the difference. Saul may have had a head knowledge of God but he didn’t have a heart knowledge of Christ. I agree that it’s the work of the Holy Spirit that changes people. Life always precedes actions.

      You may disagree with me on this but I believe that to be true in your case as well. You say that the Holy Spirit worked in you in different ways other than the gospel. And I beleive that to be true. There have been many people who have sat under the sound of the gospel that have not responded to it in a positive way. Even rejected it altogether. The personal ministry of Jesus bears this out. I guess what I am trying to say is that all of the reasoning, apologetics, preaching or whatever means used will never have an affect on you, me or anyone else until The Lord does something for us first. You didn’t respond in order to get life (eternal life), you responded because you already had life. Jesus said many times in his ministry “he that hath an ear let him hear”. He was speaking only to those who were capable of hearing Him with spiritual ears. Everyone in His presence heard him audibly but not all understand His message because they couldn’t. They didn’t have spiritual ears.

      You said in your post that “we cannot be healed unless we want to be healed. Before we can be healed, we have to recognize that we are sick”. Jesus said “they that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick”. Some people don’t see themselves as being sick. Because they can’t. They are dead spiritually. They will never see themselves in need either, unless The Lord gives them life first. “Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls”. Only those laboring and are heavy laden can come. One who is dead in his sins cannot come. “And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;) Ephesians 2 vs.1-5. I don’t know about you, but those 5 verses makes me want to shout.

      To sum it all up I beleive that if you have committed yourself to reading and living by what the scripture says, it’s because He first did something for you that made you receptive to spiritual things. So my position is that the gospel is not for everyone universally. Only those that have the ability to respond to it, and even then there will be some that have the ability to recieve it because they have spiritual life but will not live by it because it’s to hard for them. I think the parable of the sower illustrates my belief on this.

    Leave a Reply