Posted by Holly Ordway in Apologetics | 4 Comments
Defining “Belief”
Believe. We toss that word around all the time without giving it a second thought. So when I say “I believe that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior,” you and I both know where we’re at, right?
Maybe not as much as you might think. You see, “believe” can mean several quite different things.
Let me give you an example of one kind of “believe.” I live in Carlsbad, California, and I’m a big coffee drinker. So when I say “I believe that there’s a Starbucks in downtown Carlsbad near the corner of Carlsbad Blvd and Grand Ave,” that’s a statement with the weight of my own experiences backing it up: I’ve been there plenty of times and I pass by it frequently.
What about another variety of “believe”? “I believe that Bob will meet us at Starbucks at 11 AM.” I am quite sure that Bob will meet us there. He’s a punctual, reliable kind of guy. But it’s not quite the same level of confidence as my belief in the physical existence and location of Starbucks itself. After all, Starbucks isn’t going to vanish in a poof of cappuccino-scented smoke, but Bob might get stuck in traffic. (This is Southern California we’re talking about, after all.)
Then there’s a third, “wishful thinking” kind of belief: “I believe that if we all buy organic, shade-grown coffee, the quality of life of farmers around the globe will be enormously improved.” Don’t get me wrong – I think that buying shade-grown coffee is a really excellent thing to do. But that “I believe” statement isn’t a statement of known fact or even of probability based on my own experiences. It’s something I would like to be true; it’s something I have reason to think is at least partly true. But do I believe it in the same sense as I believe that Starbucks is where I say it is, or that Bob will actually meet us there (even if he’s a bit late)? Nope.
So, do we have three flavors of belief, each a little weaker than the next? Hold on – I’ve saved one for last.
There’s a fourth type of belief that is actually even more solid than the existence-of-Starbucks type that I started my example with. I wouldn’t stake my life on whether or not Starbucks was actually, at this very moment, where I think it is: there’s always the possibility that it’s closed up shop and I haven’t heard (maybe it was driven out of business by my favorite Carlsbad coffee shop, Vinaka’s – now there’s wishful thinking for you). Unlikely, but if I were put to the question, I’d admit that I don’t actually know that it’s there right now. However, when I say “I believe that it is wrong to kill an innocent person,” I believe that to be true in a deep, foundational way. I really would stake my life on it, because I know it’s true.
So here’s the real question. What kind of belief do you have in Christ?
Is it the wishful-thinking belief? “I believe in Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior because it’ll be so much nicer for me after I die if that’s true.” Christianity as car insurance. If you do end up in a wreck, you’ll be glad you signed those insurance papers. Christianity as a door prize. Come to church, pray, and look what a nice prize you get: eternal life! (Yes, that’s sarcasm.)
Maybe you’re at the “reasonably sure” belief. It’s more solidly grounded than wishful thinking, but it’s not actually something that you know for sure. It’s more like what you learn in a lot of your college classes. You haven’t actually thought much about what your professors said in class (other than to ask if it will be on the test…) but you’re confident that they’re not lying to you. Maybe you blew off studying for the quizzes, but you have a nagging feeling that you ought to hit the books harder before the final exam. So along those same lines, your pastor says that Jesus is your Savior, and you go with that. OK. That’s a place to start.
It’s natural for there to be different kinds of belief within a single person’s faith, anyway. That’s part of what growth as a Christian is all about. For instance, it took me a while to actually believe in God’s forgiveness. Intellectually I understood that yes, He loves me and would forgive me for all my sins, but there was a part of my mind that suspected He would look closely at me and say “Eh, no forgiveness for you! What were you thinking?!?” Despite reading the Bible, despite discussing it with my priest, despite understanding the concept… I still didn’t “get it” in my heart. I didn’t give up on the idea, though, because one of the things I’d learned by then was to trust in God. (That was a lot tougher than it sounds, by the way.) I was committed to wrestling with this whole forgiveness thing under the premise that God would work with me here.
And He did. He gave me the understanding that forgiveness and grace are real.
Notice that I’ve shifted my choice of word from “believe” to “understand.” I don’t “believe” that five times five is twenty-five. I understand that it is. There was a time before I went to school that I didn’t understand it. The math was still real; I just didn’t know anything about it. Later, there was a time when I knew that there was this “math thing” to figure out, but I didn’t understand how to do it yet. Then, finally, I understood it, and I could proceed from there.
And so, with being a Christian.
There was a time – not too long ago – when I didn’t know that Jesus Christ was my Lord and Savior. (In fact, I didn’t know that God existed at all.) My lack of understanding didn’t change the reality, any more than my inability to do multiplication when I was a five-year-old affected the way my parents balanced their checkbook. I didn’t know God until very recently, but He was there (and knew me) all along.
Now that I am a Christian (and it’s a long story how I got here from there), I don’t “believe” because I like the idea and want it to be true. I don’t “believe” because I think Christianity makes sense intellectually (although that was a necessary foundation to my faith). In fact, I wouldn’t say that I “believe” in God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, or that I “believe” I have a personal relationship with Him: I would say that I know these things to be true.
How do you move past “believe” to “know”? You look for truth, not convenience. You ask questions, and you don’t settle for easy, shallow answers. You grapple with ideas, and you don’t back down even when they challenge your worldview or habits.
The nice thing about reality is that it stands up to testing. The laws of physics don’t change no matter how often you drop rocks from heights. The way that faith works is sometimes complicated and subtle, but it’s no less real for all that. Asking questions won’t make Him go away: if you genuinely seek the truth, asking questions will, in fact, bring you closer to Him. After all, He is the way, the truth, and the life – whether you know Him or not, that’s who He is.
So ask questions – of yourself, of your pastor, of Him. Seek to know, not just “believe.” It’s a challenge, but the payoff is worth it. To be able to put “Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior” in the same category of knowledge as “five times five is twenty-five” is, to say the least, significant.
And life-changing. Because once we know, truly know that He is exactly who He says He is… then what can we do but follow?
No related posts.








Love this post! Your math analogy is exactly right. I became a Christian 4 years ago at age 44. Like you, I eventually and surprisingly moved from atheist to agnostic to believer through asking questions and seeking reasonable answers. I now “understand” that God exists and many other things about my faith that keep me committed to following Christ and seeking further understanding. I still wrestle with God in some areas and struggle through doubting days – yet I know that I know enough to keep going. Life changing indeed! I would love to read your full story. What were your questions and where did you find the answers?
I have found that many, many Christians fall into your first two categories of belief. They are leery, even fearful of testing or questioning – convinced that faith stands without reason. Sigh. My journey began with the mind and then moved to the heart. I now lead a young adult group and wonder if you have a recommendation for a book or study aimed at building up understanding. The people in my group are eager to learn the reason for the hope they have and have experienced the need to defend their faith in school and with unbelieving friends.
May the Lord bless you and your work.
Thanks, Linda! It’s nice to know there are other folks out there like me, who found faith through reason. One of these days I’ll write up more of my story, but the short version is that I found myself asking “What’s really true?” and then “What does that mean for my life?” (Hence the titles for the two main sections on this site!) It got kick-started by a conversation with a very intelligent Christian friend who posed some tough and really interesting questions about my atheist/agnostic worldview, especially the questions of origin (was there a First Cause?) and morality (if it’s not just a social invention, where does it come from?). I realized that I didn’t have a satisfactory explanation for either of those things, and decided that I really needed to find the answers.
I found answers largely through reading & discussion. Hmm, maybe I’ll write up a book list of books that really influenced me… I would say that the two authors who most firmly built up my understanding were CS Lewis and NT Wright. Lewis’ Mere Christianity was tremendous for me in terms of explaining faith in rational terms. His book Miracles was also helpful, as was The Great Divorce. NT Wright’s massive book The Resurrection of the Son of God was the final piece I needed, as it helped me to intellectually understand that the Resurrection was a historical fact. It’s heavy going at times but it was exactly what I needed, because it goes into real depth of detail. Since then, I’ve found that Wright’s other books are fantastic as well – I’m currently reading through his “For Everyone” series of New Testament commentaries/translations.
Let me know what books you’ve found helpful with your young adult group, or any titles you’d suggest for adding to my to-read list!
Holly, C.S. Lewis and N.T. Wright are both favorites of mine. Wright’s “Simply Christian” was a wonder. I have, but have yet to read his three volume series of which “The Resurrection of the Son of God” is third. Bishop Wright’s “For Everyone” commentaries are very light reading but contain his wonderful insights. As an Anglican I am grateful to have such a fine scholar and theologian in the fold. The turning point for me in coming to faith was the discovery that my high school biology teachers had totally misrepresented Darwinism to me – and I had not thought to doubt the veracity of what they taught. (We all make leaps of faith even if we don’t realize it.) I really thought that no thinking person believed in God and that evolution explained life. Ha! A thoughtful Christian coworker came to me one day and insisted that anyone who read Lee Strobel’s “The Case for Christ” would have to become a Christian. Of course, I wanted to read it and see if this was so – and probably prove him wrong. Fortunately, he wouldn’t let me have the book until he finished it. Lacking patience, I went to the bookstore to get my own copy and, miraculously, it was not stocked. Now this book is everywhere and always available so I really mean that God’s hand was involved here. Since I couldn’t find what I went for, I purchased “A Skeptic’s Search for God” by Ralph Muncaster. It could have been written for me and echoed most of my attitudes concerning God as the author recounted his own attempts to prove that God is not but only came to prove for himself that God is. This was the book that lead me to understand that a creator god existed. Oh no! If this was true, what might He expect of me and which of the theistic faiths belonged to Him? Providentially, my friend finished “The Case for Christ” and brought it to me the next morning. This book finished the task and I at last believed. Wonder and joy! However, if I had read it first, as I had “Mere Christianity” it would not have been enough. I needed to first know there is a God, then I could consider Christianity. There is more to my story and more people who helped me along, but that is the gist. I am deeply indebted to the many former atheists, now Christians who put their stories and discoveries in print. I would not have been able or willing to do the research on my own. The philosophical arguments for God did not do it for me, I loved C.S. Lewis but he didn’t bring me to belief. The many fine philosophical arguments for God did not persuade me. For me, God is found in science (which is silly since I’m no scientist.) The other arguments now add to my understanding but could not be first. I am a big fan of Hugh Ross and agree with his insistence that general revelation, including the sciences, will not contradict special revelation. I recommend his website to you if you have not been there. http://reasons.org/ I also really enjoy Peter Kreeft, Norman Geisler, Nancy Pearcy, Dorothy Sayers, Os Guinness, Richard Foster, J.P. Moreland, Lauren Winner, Kelly Monroe Kullberg and – oh my, such a list, I will stop now. As for the young adult group – we have used some Ravi Zacharias materials but may be ready to move into more challenging territory.
Perhaps your story and search will become one of those helpful books one day. You are now a bookmark and I look forward to your posts.
Linda, thanks for the great recommendations for further reading. Some of them I’ve discovered and loved already (Foster & Moreland) so I’ll be looking forward to checking out the rest.
It’s really interesting that you bring up the point that we need first to know there’s a God before we consider Christianity. I completely agree (and another friend of mine, a NASA scientist who became a Christian in her 40s, felt exactly the same way). A lot of people try to argue for Christianity, forgetting that if you don’t believe in God, the only argument for Christianity is a utilitarian one: that whether or not it’s true, it helps you live a good life. I always found that approach repugnant.
I, too, always felt that science and evolutionary theory explained everything, until a good friend of mine pushed me to recognize that it didn’t *actually* explain creation itself. It can handle development, but not origin. Like you, the investigation into Christianity came *after* I arrived at a theistic worldview.
Thanks again for all the kind words! I’m looking forward to some great summer reading & writing.